Sacroiliac Treatment, Research, and Education
  • Home
  • About Us/Contact Us
    • Testimonials >
      • Physical Therapists Feedback
      • Massage and Bodywork Therapists
      • Rolfers Feedback
      • Workshops Feedback
      • Distance Learning
    • Our Method
    • Qualifications
    • Lectures & Presentations
    • Contact Us
  • Patient Info
    • Hesch Certified Sacroiliac and Neck Practitioners
    • New Patient's FAQ's
    • Aurora, Denver, and Colorado Area New Patient Info
    • Out-of-State New Patient Info
    • Chart Review with Virtual Consultation
    • Patient/Client Feedback
  • Research & Publication
    • Hesch Method Basics
    • Manual Therapy >
      • Regional Interdependence
      • Righting Reflex
      • Hypomobility & Hypermobility
      • Pelvis: Cervical Compensation
    • Professional Library >
      • Complex Pelvic Dysfunction
      • Cuboid Syndrome
      • Coccyx
      • Foot, Ankle, Knee, Hip
      • Inguinal Canal
      • Low Back Pain
      • Pregnancy & SIJ
      • Shoulder
      • Sacroiliac & Pelvis
      • SIJ Miscellaneous
      • Thoracic Spine & Ribcage
      • TMJ & Cervical Spine
    • Hesch Publications
    • Blog
  • Education
    • Information on Workshop/Seminars
    • Demystifying the Coccyx
    • SIJ Dysfuntion Online Course
    • SIJ Update / Recertification
    • Whole Body Online Course
    • Washington DC Apr 25-26, 2026
  • Store

sacroiliac alignment

3/18/2012

 
In response to an inquiry re pelvic/sij alignment.
Derek,
I have seen x-rays of "aligned" clients who had surgery and they were not aligned at the symphysis pubis joint and not aligned in the transverse plane.  Tops of iliac crests appear to be symmetrical. a huge problem is the fact that the body can cause asymmetry of the pelvis from joints in the spine, hip, knee, the 26 bones in foot and ankle, all the musculature, even asymmetry of shoulders can pulll on a muscle that connects the shoulder to the ilium; latissimus dorsi. 

Research on x-rays covered in my torsion chapter briefly, positional artifact can affect some of the alignment. Some clients have a developmental asymmetry of the hemipelvis and this can be readily discerned. I am much more concerned about maximizing joint function than "alignment". Asymmetry, visual malalignment guides me to do passive joint testing to confirm or negate possibilities. 

Several pelvic asymmetries look very similar, so the passive mobility testing and ligament testing is crucial to discern.  Further there are advanced patterns that are not taught to Physical Therapists, that PT's cannot find with the traditional testing. It is what it is. It is far more comnplex than what is being propounded, but fortunately for the majority, the presentation is fairly typical such as the Most Common Pattern.  If interested in more you can find more at the Hesch Institute web site.  Snake oil or purple kool aide $$$ dunno but we can be much more thorough in testing and treating and much more honest in the information we give to desperate clients.  It is a choice we (as clinicians) can make.

SUPINATED FOOT AND ANKLE, aka TYPE II CUBOID SYNDROME

3/16/2012

 
(18/2/06 3:59 am)
Jerry's Reply

Cuboid
    
Good answers re the topic of cuboid syndrome. I have treated this for 2 decades, so I have some thoughts. I intended to submit a letter to the editor after the article cited earlier in JOSPT in 2005, but never did. In my opinion, there are essentially 2 basic types of cuboid syndrome. I do not believe that this has been adequately addressed in the literature. For convenience I am going to name one type a TYPE I CUBOID SYNDROME  and the other a TYPE II CUBOID SYNDROME. 

Type I can be symptomatic or asymptomatic.  It responds beautifully to a manipulation of the cuboid, and the cuboid alone.  If painful, the pain resolves very quickly and the treatment is repeated if necessary, 1 or 2 times. Client and clinician are both happy. Recovery is quick.
Basically the cuboid fixation is the key lesion in the foot and ankle complex and restoring mobility directly to the cuboid makes for significant improvement.  Sometimes there is a pattern that appears to involve several other structures in the foot and ankle, yet the manipulation performed only at the cuboid, is almost magical. Retesting the other motion fixations reveals that they are also remarkably improved and they do not require treatment. I affectionately and metaphoriclly refer to the cuboid as "1/2 of a keystone." It has no lateral
structure to articulate with, as it is the most lateral of that row of mid foot bones. When it subluxes laterally with foot and ankle in inversion, there is much to hold it out there, the articulating lateral cunieform and the articulating calcaneus. The navicular also articulates with the cuboid, and the 4th and 5th metatarsals proably play a rather minor role. It is very helpful to have a foot and ankle model that includes the whole foot and a short portion of
the distal tibia and fibula, of course talus and calcaneus included. Take apart the joint leaving the forefoot, the cuneoforms, the navicular and the cuboid as one and the talus and calcaneus are seperate (as is their attachment to the distal tibia and fibula. It is so helpful to learning, to have this semi-disarticulated model in hand. You can put the pieces together and observe how the bones interact. It should be easy to perceive how the cuboid is "out there by itself" being most lateral and it is easy to see how it could be elevated (vertical axis) and laterally rotated about an A-P axis,  remaining stuck in an inversion injury. 

The cuboid can be palpated and compared to the unaffected side. Typically it is more prominent on the painful side and inferior glide spring testing and "pronatory" spring testing reveal fixation (and discomfort). I do not believe that one can NOT accurately perform a
superior glide spring test due to thickness of the soft tissue on the plantar surface of the foot. The typical manipulation is opposite to the way I prefer to mobilize it. The typical manipulation involves a superior thrust from the plantar surface of the foot, see details in other post, below. The typical manipulation appears to enhance the lesion - yet gap the joint and I believe that it recoils back to normal position. I prefer to mobilize it with progressive inferior glide (dorsal to plantar direction)and add medial rotation mobilization, while I attempt to "create space" and coax it back by taking the navicular and the cuboids into medial glide and medial rotation.  

Now a description of what I conveniently refer to as TYPE II CUBOID SYNDROME. This can be symptomatic or asymptomatic, with all grades in between from acute to chronic. The difference is that a supinatory pattern of the foot and ankle complex has set in and efforts to mobilize only the cuboid will fail miserably, will not provide that quick fix, described earlier.
Instead, you have to treat all major articulations and this is where we get into some controversy. This same pattern is commonly encountered in recurrent ankle sprains. I find restrictions (in the oppsite directions) and restore mobility in the following directions:

MAJOR MOTIONS OF THE FOOT AND ANKLE: 
  • posterior glide of the talus - the method also mobilizes the calcaneus anteriorly at the same time 
  • medial rotation of the talus 
  • +/- internal rotation of the talus 
  • +/- posterior glide of distal tibia 
  • +/- medial rotation of distal tibia 
  • posterior glide of the distal malleolus (on rare occasions it is found to be stuck posteriorly thus mobilized nteriorly) 
  • +/- ant or post glide of fibular head 
  • superior glide of the fibula (not described in the bulk of the literature, but indeed a very relevant, seperate accessory motion - great research project) This does NOT self-correct as a coupled motion with mobilization/Muscle Energy in A-P, or P-A directions. 
  • inferior glide and medial rotation of the navicular and then incorporating the cunieoforms 
  • inferior glide and medial rotation/medial glide to the cuboid superior/inferior glide to base of 5th metatarsal  
  •  last but not least is the calcaneus:
At this point one will typically note that the calcaneus still has restricted eversion and abduction and the secret to restoring valgus/eversion (ultimately to restore normal functional pronation) is actually to mobilize the above bulleted sequence and then the calcaneus 30x into abduction and the valgus/eversion is then restored automatically without directly performing a valgus/eversion force. The abduction is the key - of course, after the above sequence. I think that I might be one of the first to name the abduction as a necessary motion in restoring calcaneal valgus (late 1980's) - I just stumbled on it many years ago in the clinic - but if you have a reference that says otherwise, please let me know. 

Sometimes just before the final mob to the calcaneus I will evaluate and treat if needed, medial glide to the talus working through the distal fibula and just below it as well. After all of the above I go into a weight-bearing context and adress those motions that I can - if I find them to be restricted in weight bearing, such as distal tibia rotation, calcaneal valgus, etc. I teach the client to internally rotate from hip down to distal tibia and gently, repeatedly self-mobilize into pronation 30-100 reps, daily for a week and then as needed. 

There are other flavors in which there is enough laxity in the ligaments that the above is not
effective, fortunatley these are in the minority and I am not referrring to this sub-population is this commentary. There is a great need for more research on the above topic and I think that our profession does not typically look at structures as patterns of motion dysfunction. The Cuboid Syndrome a perfect example in which only one dysfunctional structure (the cuboid) is mentioned and only mobilization to that singular structure is described. I have made a case
for Type II Cuboid Syndrome being a much more complex pattern that requires a dozen or more sequential mobility screens and treatment with mobilization. Terms like hypermobility and hypomobility get tossed around in the literature without adequate clarification, without explaining in detail, the tests are used with the cuboid.

New graphics for workbook.

3/15/2012

 
I am delighted to announce a significant enhancement to the graphics in the 190 page Hesch Method lumbopelvic workshop. It will go to print tomorrow but will continue the grueling process to make many enhancements.

Manual Therapy Hesch Method of treating the rest of the body

3/14/2012

 
We are in the planning stages of a tutorial of hands-on learning in Las Vegas last week in April. Two day 6 hours each, covering all major articulations toes to nose, TMJ so "top of nose". TBA. Will limit enrollment to 6.

Nice compliment from Pelvic Instability Association

3/13/2012

 
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your final article.  We will need to make it a two part
  article.  Do you have a preference where it should be split in
two?
  Just some feedback I received about your work via one of our
  Australian members via our Facebook page:
  "Hi - I have had PGP for four years. I am slowly
  making sense of it as I navigate through life, two toddlers and a two storey
  house. I have just spoken to my specialist about Jerry Hesch and she said that
  she has a patient who went to the US to see him and was happy with the results.
  My specialist has referred me to another specialist who knows of Jerry's work
  and if anyone in Australia practises his method."
  I know how lovely it is to get feedback
sometimes!   I works as a primary care nurse (Family & Child Health &
General  Practice) and my husband is a doctor (Family Medicine).
  Thanks for being a member of our
  association.
  Kind regards,
Jess
 Pelvic Instability Association Inc
  (PIA)
PO
BOX  449
Bentleigh,
  VIC 3204
PH:
  (61-3) 9539 3217 (Message-bank)
www.pelvicinstability.org.au

NIce Compliment March 2012

3/11/2012

 
"Nice compliment.
After having some
big  setbacks and flare-ups in the last month I decided to go see Jerry Hesch
near  Las Vegas. I saw him over three days and he was full of information for
me. My  sacrum was completely stuck out of place by the time I got there which
was good  because he could see my full dysfunction; he saw me at my worst! He
evaluated me  from foot to head and corrected my pelvis/sacrum. I finally have a
name for my  dysfunction: “bi lateral inflare of the illia” and “ posterior
glide fixation of  the sacrum”.

He corrected it very gently and showed
my husband how to do  the correction. Jerry’s initial correction lasted five
days, including one day  of air travel, it has relapsed since, but because of
the training we received we  have been able to do the correction ourselves at
home. On our first attempt, we  weren’t quite getting it so Jerry walked my
husband thru it on the phone. I  can’t even tell you the relief I feel of
knowing what is wrong and being able to  correct it. None of those self
corrections were ever totally working before.  Even though I have had some good
local people help me before, my main problem  was never thoroughly diagnosed or
addressed.

Unfortunately, like a lot  of you in the group I am hyper
mobile all over so need to be careful. Jerry also  addressed some stuck joints
in my foot, shoulder and neck/sternum.

He  also did a lot of problem
solving around a strange twist in my torso that I get  when I lean forward. The
first day he just said “I don’t know” and the second  day he had me do all kinds
of things to figure out where the heck it was coming  from. It turns out my
right hip joint is much looser than the left and this is  causing the twist and
is also making my right leg appear longer and my right  illium higher in
standing. (Jerry, correct me if i am not explaining right.)  Jerry suggested I
see a hip specialist but in the meantime gave me an exercise  that may help it
along with some other simple strengthening exercises and tips  in doing daily
activities. He also suggested trying a heel lift in the left  shoe.

He
has a wealth of knowledge, but what is also impressive is that  he has a lot of
intellectual curiosity and great problem-solving skills. Instead  of fitting my
condition into his existing bag of tricks, he took the time to  analyze a
problem when he hits an unknown area or a sticking point. I would  highly
recommend him to anyone who doesn’t understand their dysfunction and  wants a
thorough evaluation from a thoughtful and analytical practitioner. The  best
part was that we never felt rushed like you do at a regular PT or doctor’s
  appointment. He is not a radiologist but also goes over your x-rays and MRI’s
  with you and examines them before you arrive. I am very glad I went and feel
  hopeful."

"SIJD" with sciatica, PN and muscle weakness

2/29/2012

 
Actual Email reply to an inquiry re "SIJD" with sciatica, PN and muscle weakness.
February 26,2012 
 
Dear  XXXXXX

    You have been on my concern list having read some of your posts, though I do not do any form of aggressive marketing to the group, as most already have health care providers, though if I  had a magic wand, would screen a few, XXXXXXX is also on my worry list, and I worry about some who slowly sip the kool aide and end up getting an sijd fusion for a problem that comes from somewhere else. The marketing can be unintentional and very subtle. The name of the group should be changed to something that encompasses the entire spectrum of co-factors; especially the lumbar spine and hip, and gynecological...My philosophy, "Conservative care, put patient first," and above all “DO NO HARM.” Like I told my recent client, “people need information.” That is what I do as much as I do highly skilled manual therapy to the whole body, because injuries affect the WHOLE BODY. When one has complex sijd with a lumbar or thoracic spine as primary, or when the signs of sijd are simple false negatives, not the real cause, you can present as such. SIJD is a diagnosis of exclusion after the thoracic spine (rare disc herniation there) and thoroughly ruled out lumbar pathology, disc herniation, stenosis with impingement, radiculopathy, etc, then thoroughly clear the hips, and gynecology, you can go on and screen for sijd.

     I  perform very thorough whole-body evaluations including all of the above and my sij eval is much more thorough that the current standard, has been for 25+ years. The current tests are really not the “gold standard” that is being marketed. If ever in Las Vegas and you want an evaluation plus or minus treatment my work is complete within 1, 2, or 3 visits, going much further than standard PT and working very hard to make patients independent of me able to  manage the sijd but of course need continued strengthening via formal PT or some program at home. You can read about it in the patient section at  www.HeschInstitute.com
then: FOR PATIENTS

     If I knew more about your condition, I could be more helpful, but the only way to do that is to invest a reasonable amount of time, I read the records you send and call you afterwards. This typically is accomplished in 30 minutes sometimes 45, rarely more. So a phone consult is done before we ever schedule a visit, and sometimes it does not need to go any further. I have helped a few in this manner and sometimes help means encouraging a specific workup that has not been done, and last week I discouraged someone from coming to see me because I know that his problem is neurosurgical/pathology that is beyond my advanced skill set. Sometimes the eval can be useful when a change of perspective is needed, as people do tend to “marry the diagnosis” and sometimes that will not and cannot satisfy in the long run. I do know the limits of my knowledge, a very important perspective all clinicians should embrace (when to refer, when this paradigm is not the correct one, etc.).

     I hope this is helpful. Best advice; think outside the sijd box.

     I do know that some do benefit from surgical stabilization, but dislike the failures of the marketing process, attracting some with WRONG DIAGNOSIS.

Best  Regards,
Jerry Hesch

COCCYX ARTICLE JUST PUBLISHED

2/23/2012

 
Noteworthy that about 1/3 seemed to have mechanical cause the other 2/3 noteworthy.
Eur Spine  J. 2012 Feb 22. [Epub ahead of print]
Magnetic resonance imaging findings in the painful adult coccyx.
Maigne JY, Pigeau I, Roger B.

Source
Medicine Physique, Hotel-Dieu Hospital, Hotel-Dieu de Paris, 75181, Paris
cedex 04, France, [email protected].
 
Abstract
OBJECTIVE:
Imaging of the painful coccyx currently relies on standard and dynamic radiography. There are no literature data on MRI of the coccyx. This examination could provide information on the cause of pain.


METHODS:
172 patients with severe chronic coccydynia underwent MRI and dynamic radiography of the coccyx.


RESULTS:
Disc abnormalities (seen in 70 patients) were related to either the presence of intradiscal liquid effusion (17/70), or abnormality of the endplates similar to Modic 1 changes (38/70), or uncertain abnormalities (15/70). Abnormalities of the tip of the coccyx (seen in 41 patients) were located in the surrounding soft tissues: venous dilatations (18/41), soft tissue inflammation (13/41) and ambiguous images (9/41). Vertebral bone oedema was observed in five cases and a benign tumour was observed once. The type of imaging feature depend broadly on the mobility of the coccyx: the 105 cases with a mobile coccyx mainly presented
abnormal features mainly in a disc (63 cases vs. 4 cases for the tip), whereas the 67 patients with a rigid coccyx mainly showed abnormal features at the tip (37 cases vs. 7 for the joints, p < 0.001).

 CONCLUSIONS:
We recommend MRI of the painful coccyx when dynamic radiography fails to reveal clearly a pathological lesion (i.e., normal or slightly increased mobility of the coccyx or a rigid coccyx lacking a spicule).

Nice follow up: severe sciatica 2 years duration

2/22/2012

 
This is a spontaneous Email from a PT from out of state.  I saw her once and gave a strong letter suggesting a work up for discitis (infection in the disc) and this or a lower thoracic herniateion after testing with provocation, first in neutral, then extension, then child pose, tapping T1-S5.  She had 2 fairly normal MRI’s yet severe sciatica for 2 years, obviously in significant duress, runs a large practice, has a 3 year old and a one year old and this really affects her ability to be a mom. 

“…I have felt improvment no doubt due to seeing you. I have more range of motion without
such a stiff end range in every position I tried. I would have unrelievable pressure that seems you have really helped. I do think the underlying cause you are probably right on track with the discitis. After researching it, it makes more since.  This is the best I have felt in over a year, and the cheapiest thing yet.


 …Shirley Sarhmann has a great outlook on the effects on mal alignment and recoil etc.…If
someone would put her methods and yours together, it would be amazing. In fact that was the approach I took. I had two 270 pound men who were thinking of surgery become pain free by using your and her techniques. And they lost no weight….THank you, Thank you, Thank you. And I will now return any help i can to  you
. “

Pelvi Pain Book is Remarkable

2/17/2012

 
Book Review

 CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN AND DYSFUNCTION: Practical Physical Medicine
 Leon Chaitow, Ruth Longrove Jones 
Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier  2012
 ISBN 9780702035326

 I give this book a very enthusiastic 4.5/5 star recommendation.  A slight confusion may exist in part of the title “physical medicine.” The reader is not given a clear definition thereof and it should not be confused with the medical specialty named Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, of which there is apparently one contributing author.  Rather, I believe that the term “Physical Medicine” applies to a broad category of hands-on, non-surgical, non-pharmacological approaches, practiced by a variety of clinicians, perhaps appreciated by perusing the table of contents, and the interdisciplinary, international list of contributing
authors.  Would “manual and movement therapies” be the same as “physical medicine?” 
It begs some definition.  The contributing authors cover very wide territory, from multiple
specialties.  It truly is an inter-disciplinary work. Hence it is not a book to sell an alternative or complimentary paradigm, not a “we versus them” approach, but rather, a large palate that acknowledges the singular complex canvas of complex chronic pelvic pain that mandates multidisciplinary perspective, and certainly benefits from skilled hands-on expertise. 
 
This book has the accompanying DVD placed inside the front jacket, and there are instructions for downloading and access to telephonic tech assistance if needed.  Fortunately, it opened with no difficulty and was very much appreciated.   It is very nice to see this very useful DVD in the inside front cover so that readers will perhaps immediately access it.  It is especially helpful in learning some of clinical applications that are best understood visually and dynamically, versus only being read.   

An early disappointment is the fact that not all authors are identified beyond acronyms such as“MD”.  What is their medical specialty, such as urology, or gynecology, etc.?   From
the foreword of the book:  “…The nature of pelvic pain is complicated,…This is a coherent volume that helpfully gathers the variety of regimens and techniques.”  This goal is accomplished with an interdisciplinary group of 22 authors who bring a wealth of experience.  The introductory chapter states: “This book has a single primary aim – to offer a one stop source of relevant information for clinicians – specialists, practitioners and therapists – on the subject of non-malignant chronic pelvic pain (CPP), with particular emphasis on current
trends in physical medicine approaches to assessment, treatment, management, and care.”
   
 
Every chapter is well written and very well referenced.  The graphics and pictures are very
useful as are the various tables.  Some of the authors use minor terminologies that may differ from “American English”, such as “whilst,” “saddle” for “seat”,“football” for “soccer”, etc., which simply reminds the reviewer that this is an international group of authors, and perhaps reminds the reader of this reviewers attempt at being thorough.   The book does give broad coverage in 16 chapters and several sub chapters.  Several chapters provide very unique perspective, such that it is with regret I make mention of only a few (see previous recommendation re TOC).  For example, a chapter authored by a Urologist brings clinical gems that are clearly beyond textbook knowledge, and which can only be accomplished with
many years of dedicated observation and experience.   A remarkable chapter by an Irish physiotherapist is worth the price of the book alone, titled; Practical anatomy, examination, palpation and manual therapy release techniques for the pelvic floor.  An exceptional
chapter on external soft tissue manipulation approaches is very thorough in presentation, very well researched with over 100 references and an abundance of images.  It is followed by another exceptional one on connective tissue and the pudendal nerve, with an abundance
of hands-on eval and treatment strategies.  The chapter on urological CPP has broad overview in 7 pages and does not disappoint the manual soft tissue clinician with 12 pages on neuromuscular treatment, especially of internal trigger points.  The reviewer feels compelled to remind the reader of the exceptional DVD covering much of the clinical content.  Both genders are covered throughout the book, and in fact, there is a specific chapter titled
“Gender and CPP”.  A noteworthy chapter on sports and CPP which happens to be the longest chapter in the book, covers broad territory, including detailed coverage of pressure studies on
bicycle saddles (seats) as it relates to pudendal neuralgia and several other important topics such as osteitis pubis, sports hernia, hip pathology and peri-inguinal neuropathies, etc.. 
Many of the sub topics could be a chapter unto itself, yet the introductory resource here is still very valuable.  
  
In other chapters, topic such as a recent improvement in a wand for self-treatment of pelvic floor trigger points, and neuromodulation of sacral nerves with electrodes applied distally (lower leg) truly meet the definition of “cutting edge” as much as that term can be over utilized and pedestrian.  The pudendal neuralgia chapter is remarkably lucid. Very slight redundancy in some soft tissue treatment and graphics is non-detracting, especially as different authors bring unique perspective, and there are enough novel graphics of this complex region. 
Limited coverage of the role of physical therapy in utilizing manipulation and mobilization of the spine and pelvic girdle is disappointing, seeming to favor the Osteopathic approach.  Otherwise, there is an excellent chapter specifically on Osteopathic approaches, except for an attempt within it to over generalize the physical therapy approach to lumbopelvic dysfunction,
citing only one rehab model.  A 5-star bonus is the appendix with functional outcome scales with very helpful introductory paragraphs and instructions for scoring.  There are 11 listed clinical outcome measurement tools, including the very comprehensive IPPS pelvic pain assessment form.  The final inclusion is a description of eight standard pelvic pain
provocation tests from the European guidelines.  

One disappointment is what I call “a missing chapter element”. Partially covered in a
general manner within the multi-specialty and multidisciplinary (UK) chapter and the interdisciplinary (US) chapter; is the team approach to this complex topic, and the listing of multiple specialties.  However, the missing element is a much needed guide which would go beyond the assumption that the client is already under the care of an appropriate medical physician(s) as part of the team for CPP.  The title of a proposed chapter would be something similar to: “The necessity ofscreening for medical referral, what every manual, alternative/complimentary, body/mind and movement practitioner should know.”  
Additional coverage on the topic of pelvic joint instability, obstetric pubic symphyseal diastasis and orthopedic trauma instabilities seem worthy of inclusion, perhaps as its own
chapter.  Unfortunately, some of this is actually trivialized as being a belief system that predicts failure of intervention (see Figure 1.1).  Although this perception is valid at times, many other times, as evidenced with traditional imaging, it is a valid contemporary source of
debilitating CPP, as evidenced by web sites such as the www.PelvicInstability.org.au, (one of several) orthopedic trauma research, obstetric literature, etc..  

The book is a carefully crafted work that belongs in the hands of all hands-on clinicians who specialize in the subject matter or who want to specialize, and for others who simply desire to be more aware of it.  Also as a relevant resource to practitioners who utilize the team
approach.  The book has solid, vast, theoretical underpinning within the first eight chapters, and the following eight chapters are specific to intervention with an abundance of hands-on techniques such that“Physical Medicine” practitioners can learn and integrate in their practice, or, at the very least, fine-tune current skills.  This text is placed prominently on the reviewer’s accessible bookshelf in the clinic, and it is endorsed with a 4.5/5 star recommendation. 
 
Jerry Hesch, MHS, PT
<<Previous
Forward>>
    Jerry Hesch, MHS, PT, DPT(s) – Las Vegas Physical Therapy

    RSS Feed

    Dr. Jerry Hesch, DPT, MHS, PT

    Married with 4 grown kids.  Earned my Doctorate at A.T. Still University in Tempe, AZ, MHS at the University of Indianapolis and my BS PT at University of New Mexico.  I enjoy working with my hands and particularly making glass objet d'art.

    Powered by Calendar Labs

    Archives

    August 2016
    October 2015
    August 2015
    September 2014
    August 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    June 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    March 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    September 2011

    Categories

    All
    Adjustment
    Cervical
    Clinicians
    Coccydynia
    Coccyxalgia
    Coccyx Joint
    Coccyx Pain
    Cuboid Syndrome
    Failed Back Syndrome
    General
    Hesch
    Hesch Method
    Hesch Method Lumbopelvic Workbook
    Hip
    Jerry Hesch
    Lateral Tilt
    Manual Therapy
    Manual Therapy Tutorial
    Pelvic Mechanics
    Pelvic Pain
    Pelvic Side Glide
    Pelvis
    Piriformis
    Pubalgia
    Pudendal Neuralgia
    Sacroiliac
    Sacroiliac Fusion
    Sacroiliac Instability Needs Whole Body Approach
    Sacroiliac Joint
    Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction
    Sacroiuliac
    Sciatica
    Seminar
    Sij
    Sijd
    Sij Fusion
    Spring Tests
    Supinated Foot
    Symphysis Pubis
    Thank You
    Thoracic T4 Syndrome
    Traction
    Trigger Point

Patient Info
​

Personalized evaluation and treatment for chronic pain, TMJ disorder, and complex musculoskeletal conditions. 
​


​Learn more 
https://www.heschinstitute.com/new-patients-faqs.html


Education for Clinicians 

Continuing education courses, workshops, and clinical resources focused on advanced manual therapy and biomechanics assessment. 
​


Explore course and training 
https://www.heschinstitute.com/education.html

Educational Videos &. Resources 

Watch in-depth clinical discussions and patient-friendly educational content. 




​
​YouTube: 

WWW.YOUTUBE.COM/@JERRYHESCHINSTITUTE



Contact

25837 E. Maple Place
Aurora, CO 80018-4596

Phone: (303) 366-9445 
FAX (303) 366-9998
Monday-Thursday 11:00am - 3:00pm 
MST


​
​BY APPOINTMENT ONLY

Email address:
​[email protected]


Copyright © 2015 Hesch Institute. All rights reserved. 
  • Home
  • About Us/Contact Us
    • Testimonials >
      • Physical Therapists Feedback
      • Massage and Bodywork Therapists
      • Rolfers Feedback
      • Workshops Feedback
      • Distance Learning
    • Our Method
    • Qualifications
    • Lectures & Presentations
    • Contact Us
  • Patient Info
    • Hesch Certified Sacroiliac and Neck Practitioners
    • New Patient's FAQ's
    • Aurora, Denver, and Colorado Area New Patient Info
    • Out-of-State New Patient Info
    • Chart Review with Virtual Consultation
    • Patient/Client Feedback
  • Research & Publication
    • Hesch Method Basics
    • Manual Therapy >
      • Regional Interdependence
      • Righting Reflex
      • Hypomobility & Hypermobility
      • Pelvis: Cervical Compensation
    • Professional Library >
      • Complex Pelvic Dysfunction
      • Cuboid Syndrome
      • Coccyx
      • Foot, Ankle, Knee, Hip
      • Inguinal Canal
      • Low Back Pain
      • Pregnancy & SIJ
      • Shoulder
      • Sacroiliac & Pelvis
      • SIJ Miscellaneous
      • Thoracic Spine & Ribcage
      • TMJ & Cervical Spine
    • Hesch Publications
    • Blog
  • Education
    • Information on Workshop/Seminars
    • Demystifying the Coccyx
    • SIJ Dysfuntion Online Course
    • SIJ Update / Recertification
    • Whole Body Online Course
    • Washington DC Apr 25-26, 2026
  • Store