|
In response to an inquiry re pelvic/sij alignment.
Derek, I have seen x-rays of "aligned" clients who had surgery and they were not aligned at the symphysis pubis joint and not aligned in the transverse plane. Tops of iliac crests appear to be symmetrical. a huge problem is the fact that the body can cause asymmetry of the pelvis from joints in the spine, hip, knee, the 26 bones in foot and ankle, all the musculature, even asymmetry of shoulders can pulll on a muscle that connects the shoulder to the ilium; latissimus dorsi. Research on x-rays covered in my torsion chapter briefly, positional artifact can affect some of the alignment. Some clients have a developmental asymmetry of the hemipelvis and this can be readily discerned. I am much more concerned about maximizing joint function than "alignment". Asymmetry, visual malalignment guides me to do passive joint testing to confirm or negate possibilities. Several pelvic asymmetries look very similar, so the passive mobility testing and ligament testing is crucial to discern. Further there are advanced patterns that are not taught to Physical Therapists, that PT's cannot find with the traditional testing. It is what it is. It is far more comnplex than what is being propounded, but fortunately for the majority, the presentation is fairly typical such as the Most Common Pattern. If interested in more you can find more at the Hesch Institute web site. Snake oil or purple kool aide $$$ dunno but we can be much more thorough in testing and treating and much more honest in the information we give to desperate clients. It is a choice we (as clinicians) can make. (18/2/06 3:59 am)
Jerry's Reply Cuboid Good answers re the topic of cuboid syndrome. I have treated this for 2 decades, so I have some thoughts. I intended to submit a letter to the editor after the article cited earlier in JOSPT in 2005, but never did. In my opinion, there are essentially 2 basic types of cuboid syndrome. I do not believe that this has been adequately addressed in the literature. For convenience I am going to name one type a TYPE I CUBOID SYNDROME and the other a TYPE II CUBOID SYNDROME. Type I can be symptomatic or asymptomatic. It responds beautifully to a manipulation of the cuboid, and the cuboid alone. If painful, the pain resolves very quickly and the treatment is repeated if necessary, 1 or 2 times. Client and clinician are both happy. Recovery is quick. Basically the cuboid fixation is the key lesion in the foot and ankle complex and restoring mobility directly to the cuboid makes for significant improvement. Sometimes there is a pattern that appears to involve several other structures in the foot and ankle, yet the manipulation performed only at the cuboid, is almost magical. Retesting the other motion fixations reveals that they are also remarkably improved and they do not require treatment. I affectionately and metaphoriclly refer to the cuboid as "1/2 of a keystone." It has no lateral structure to articulate with, as it is the most lateral of that row of mid foot bones. When it subluxes laterally with foot and ankle in inversion, there is much to hold it out there, the articulating lateral cunieform and the articulating calcaneus. The navicular also articulates with the cuboid, and the 4th and 5th metatarsals proably play a rather minor role. It is very helpful to have a foot and ankle model that includes the whole foot and a short portion of the distal tibia and fibula, of course talus and calcaneus included. Take apart the joint leaving the forefoot, the cuneoforms, the navicular and the cuboid as one and the talus and calcaneus are seperate (as is their attachment to the distal tibia and fibula. It is so helpful to learning, to have this semi-disarticulated model in hand. You can put the pieces together and observe how the bones interact. It should be easy to perceive how the cuboid is "out there by itself" being most lateral and it is easy to see how it could be elevated (vertical axis) and laterally rotated about an A-P axis, remaining stuck in an inversion injury. The cuboid can be palpated and compared to the unaffected side. Typically it is more prominent on the painful side and inferior glide spring testing and "pronatory" spring testing reveal fixation (and discomfort). I do not believe that one can NOT accurately perform a superior glide spring test due to thickness of the soft tissue on the plantar surface of the foot. The typical manipulation is opposite to the way I prefer to mobilize it. The typical manipulation involves a superior thrust from the plantar surface of the foot, see details in other post, below. The typical manipulation appears to enhance the lesion - yet gap the joint and I believe that it recoils back to normal position. I prefer to mobilize it with progressive inferior glide (dorsal to plantar direction)and add medial rotation mobilization, while I attempt to "create space" and coax it back by taking the navicular and the cuboids into medial glide and medial rotation. Now a description of what I conveniently refer to as TYPE II CUBOID SYNDROME. This can be symptomatic or asymptomatic, with all grades in between from acute to chronic. The difference is that a supinatory pattern of the foot and ankle complex has set in and efforts to mobilize only the cuboid will fail miserably, will not provide that quick fix, described earlier. Instead, you have to treat all major articulations and this is where we get into some controversy. This same pattern is commonly encountered in recurrent ankle sprains. I find restrictions (in the oppsite directions) and restore mobility in the following directions: MAJOR MOTIONS OF THE FOOT AND ANKLE:
Sometimes just before the final mob to the calcaneus I will evaluate and treat if needed, medial glide to the talus working through the distal fibula and just below it as well. After all of the above I go into a weight-bearing context and adress those motions that I can - if I find them to be restricted in weight bearing, such as distal tibia rotation, calcaneal valgus, etc. I teach the client to internally rotate from hip down to distal tibia and gently, repeatedly self-mobilize into pronation 30-100 reps, daily for a week and then as needed. There are other flavors in which there is enough laxity in the ligaments that the above is not effective, fortunatley these are in the minority and I am not referrring to this sub-population is this commentary. There is a great need for more research on the above topic and I think that our profession does not typically look at structures as patterns of motion dysfunction. The Cuboid Syndrome a perfect example in which only one dysfunctional structure (the cuboid) is mentioned and only mobilization to that singular structure is described. I have made a case for Type II Cuboid Syndrome being a much more complex pattern that requires a dozen or more sequential mobility screens and treatment with mobilization. Terms like hypermobility and hypomobility get tossed around in the literature without adequate clarification, without explaining in detail, the tests are used with the cuboid. I am delighted to announce a significant enhancement to the graphics in the 190 page Hesch Method lumbopelvic workshop. It will go to print tomorrow but will continue the grueling process to make many enhancements.
We are in the planning stages of a tutorial of hands-on learning in Las Vegas last week in April. Two day 6 hours each, covering all major articulations toes to nose, TMJ so "top of nose". TBA. Will limit enrollment to 6.
Hi Jerry,
Thanks for your final article. We will need to make it a two part article. Do you have a preference where it should be split in two? Just some feedback I received about your work via one of our Australian members via our Facebook page: "Hi - I have had PGP for four years. I am slowly making sense of it as I navigate through life, two toddlers and a two storey house. I have just spoken to my specialist about Jerry Hesch and she said that she has a patient who went to the US to see him and was happy with the results. My specialist has referred me to another specialist who knows of Jerry's work and if anyone in Australia practises his method." I know how lovely it is to get feedback sometimes! I works as a primary care nurse (Family & Child Health & General Practice) and my husband is a doctor (Family Medicine). Thanks for being a member of our association. Kind regards, Jess Pelvic Instability Association Inc (PIA) PO BOX 449 Bentleigh, VIC 3204 PH: (61-3) 9539 3217 (Message-bank) www.pelvicinstability.org.au "Nice compliment.
After having some big setbacks and flare-ups in the last month I decided to go see Jerry Hesch near Las Vegas. I saw him over three days and he was full of information for me. My sacrum was completely stuck out of place by the time I got there which was good because he could see my full dysfunction; he saw me at my worst! He evaluated me from foot to head and corrected my pelvis/sacrum. I finally have a name for my dysfunction: “bi lateral inflare of the illia” and “ posterior glide fixation of the sacrum”. He corrected it very gently and showed my husband how to do the correction. Jerry’s initial correction lasted five days, including one day of air travel, it has relapsed since, but because of the training we received we have been able to do the correction ourselves at home. On our first attempt, we weren’t quite getting it so Jerry walked my husband thru it on the phone. I can’t even tell you the relief I feel of knowing what is wrong and being able to correct it. None of those self corrections were ever totally working before. Even though I have had some good local people help me before, my main problem was never thoroughly diagnosed or addressed. Unfortunately, like a lot of you in the group I am hyper mobile all over so need to be careful. Jerry also addressed some stuck joints in my foot, shoulder and neck/sternum. He also did a lot of problem solving around a strange twist in my torso that I get when I lean forward. The first day he just said “I don’t know” and the second day he had me do all kinds of things to figure out where the heck it was coming from. It turns out my right hip joint is much looser than the left and this is causing the twist and is also making my right leg appear longer and my right illium higher in standing. (Jerry, correct me if i am not explaining right.) Jerry suggested I see a hip specialist but in the meantime gave me an exercise that may help it along with some other simple strengthening exercises and tips in doing daily activities. He also suggested trying a heel lift in the left shoe. He has a wealth of knowledge, but what is also impressive is that he has a lot of intellectual curiosity and great problem-solving skills. Instead of fitting my condition into his existing bag of tricks, he took the time to analyze a problem when he hits an unknown area or a sticking point. I would highly recommend him to anyone who doesn’t understand their dysfunction and wants a thorough evaluation from a thoughtful and analytical practitioner. The best part was that we never felt rushed like you do at a regular PT or doctor’s appointment. He is not a radiologist but also goes over your x-rays and MRI’s with you and examines them before you arrive. I am very glad I went and feel hopeful." Actual Email reply to an inquiry re "SIJD" with sciatica, PN and muscle weakness.
February 26,2012 Dear XXXXXX You have been on my concern list having read some of your posts, though I do not do any form of aggressive marketing to the group, as most already have health care providers, though if I had a magic wand, would screen a few, XXXXXXX is also on my worry list, and I worry about some who slowly sip the kool aide and end up getting an sijd fusion for a problem that comes from somewhere else. The marketing can be unintentional and very subtle. The name of the group should be changed to something that encompasses the entire spectrum of co-factors; especially the lumbar spine and hip, and gynecological...My philosophy, "Conservative care, put patient first," and above all “DO NO HARM.” Like I told my recent client, “people need information.” That is what I do as much as I do highly skilled manual therapy to the whole body, because injuries affect the WHOLE BODY. When one has complex sijd with a lumbar or thoracic spine as primary, or when the signs of sijd are simple false negatives, not the real cause, you can present as such. SIJD is a diagnosis of exclusion after the thoracic spine (rare disc herniation there) and thoroughly ruled out lumbar pathology, disc herniation, stenosis with impingement, radiculopathy, etc, then thoroughly clear the hips, and gynecology, you can go on and screen for sijd. I perform very thorough whole-body evaluations including all of the above and my sij eval is much more thorough that the current standard, has been for 25+ years. The current tests are really not the “gold standard” that is being marketed. If ever in Las Vegas and you want an evaluation plus or minus treatment my work is complete within 1, 2, or 3 visits, going much further than standard PT and working very hard to make patients independent of me able to manage the sijd but of course need continued strengthening via formal PT or some program at home. You can read about it in the patient section at www.HeschInstitute.com then: FOR PATIENTS If I knew more about your condition, I could be more helpful, but the only way to do that is to invest a reasonable amount of time, I read the records you send and call you afterwards. This typically is accomplished in 30 minutes sometimes 45, rarely more. So a phone consult is done before we ever schedule a visit, and sometimes it does not need to go any further. I have helped a few in this manner and sometimes help means encouraging a specific workup that has not been done, and last week I discouraged someone from coming to see me because I know that his problem is neurosurgical/pathology that is beyond my advanced skill set. Sometimes the eval can be useful when a change of perspective is needed, as people do tend to “marry the diagnosis” and sometimes that will not and cannot satisfy in the long run. I do know the limits of my knowledge, a very important perspective all clinicians should embrace (when to refer, when this paradigm is not the correct one, etc.). I hope this is helpful. Best advice; think outside the sijd box. I do know that some do benefit from surgical stabilization, but dislike the failures of the marketing process, attracting some with WRONG DIAGNOSIS. Best Regards, Jerry Hesch Noteworthy that about 1/3 seemed to have mechanical cause the other 2/3 noteworthy.
Eur Spine J. 2012 Feb 22. [Epub ahead of print] Magnetic resonance imaging findings in the painful adult coccyx. Maigne JY, Pigeau I, Roger B. Source Medicine Physique, Hotel-Dieu Hospital, Hotel-Dieu de Paris, 75181, Paris cedex 04, France, [email protected]. Abstract OBJECTIVE: Imaging of the painful coccyx currently relies on standard and dynamic radiography. There are no literature data on MRI of the coccyx. This examination could provide information on the cause of pain. METHODS: 172 patients with severe chronic coccydynia underwent MRI and dynamic radiography of the coccyx. RESULTS: Disc abnormalities (seen in 70 patients) were related to either the presence of intradiscal liquid effusion (17/70), or abnormality of the endplates similar to Modic 1 changes (38/70), or uncertain abnormalities (15/70). Abnormalities of the tip of the coccyx (seen in 41 patients) were located in the surrounding soft tissues: venous dilatations (18/41), soft tissue inflammation (13/41) and ambiguous images (9/41). Vertebral bone oedema was observed in five cases and a benign tumour was observed once. The type of imaging feature depend broadly on the mobility of the coccyx: the 105 cases with a mobile coccyx mainly presented abnormal features mainly in a disc (63 cases vs. 4 cases for the tip), whereas the 67 patients with a rigid coccyx mainly showed abnormal features at the tip (37 cases vs. 7 for the joints, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend MRI of the painful coccyx when dynamic radiography fails to reveal clearly a pathological lesion (i.e., normal or slightly increased mobility of the coccyx or a rigid coccyx lacking a spicule). This is a spontaneous Email from a PT from out of state. I saw her once and gave a strong letter suggesting a work up for discitis (infection in the disc) and this or a lower thoracic herniateion after testing with provocation, first in neutral, then extension, then child pose, tapping T1-S5. She had 2 fairly normal MRI’s yet severe sciatica for 2 years, obviously in significant duress, runs a large practice, has a 3 year old and a one year old and this really affects her ability to be a mom.
“…I have felt improvment no doubt due to seeing you. I have more range of motion without such a stiff end range in every position I tried. I would have unrelievable pressure that seems you have really helped. I do think the underlying cause you are probably right on track with the discitis. After researching it, it makes more since. This is the best I have felt in over a year, and the cheapiest thing yet. …Shirley Sarhmann has a great outlook on the effects on mal alignment and recoil etc.…If someone would put her methods and yours together, it would be amazing. In fact that was the approach I took. I had two 270 pound men who were thinking of surgery become pain free by using your and her techniques. And they lost no weight….THank you, Thank you, Thank you. And I will now return any help i can to you. “ Book Review
CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN AND DYSFUNCTION: Practical Physical Medicine Leon Chaitow, Ruth Longrove Jones Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier 2012 ISBN 9780702035326 I give this book a very enthusiastic 4.5/5 star recommendation. A slight confusion may exist in part of the title “physical medicine.” The reader is not given a clear definition thereof and it should not be confused with the medical specialty named Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, of which there is apparently one contributing author. Rather, I believe that the term “Physical Medicine” applies to a broad category of hands-on, non-surgical, non-pharmacological approaches, practiced by a variety of clinicians, perhaps appreciated by perusing the table of contents, and the interdisciplinary, international list of contributing authors. Would “manual and movement therapies” be the same as “physical medicine?” It begs some definition. The contributing authors cover very wide territory, from multiple specialties. It truly is an inter-disciplinary work. Hence it is not a book to sell an alternative or complimentary paradigm, not a “we versus them” approach, but rather, a large palate that acknowledges the singular complex canvas of complex chronic pelvic pain that mandates multidisciplinary perspective, and certainly benefits from skilled hands-on expertise. This book has the accompanying DVD placed inside the front jacket, and there are instructions for downloading and access to telephonic tech assistance if needed. Fortunately, it opened with no difficulty and was very much appreciated. It is very nice to see this very useful DVD in the inside front cover so that readers will perhaps immediately access it. It is especially helpful in learning some of clinical applications that are best understood visually and dynamically, versus only being read. An early disappointment is the fact that not all authors are identified beyond acronyms such as“MD”. What is their medical specialty, such as urology, or gynecology, etc.? From the foreword of the book: “…The nature of pelvic pain is complicated,…This is a coherent volume that helpfully gathers the variety of regimens and techniques.” This goal is accomplished with an interdisciplinary group of 22 authors who bring a wealth of experience. The introductory chapter states: “This book has a single primary aim – to offer a one stop source of relevant information for clinicians – specialists, practitioners and therapists – on the subject of non-malignant chronic pelvic pain (CPP), with particular emphasis on current trends in physical medicine approaches to assessment, treatment, management, and care.” Every chapter is well written and very well referenced. The graphics and pictures are very useful as are the various tables. Some of the authors use minor terminologies that may differ from “American English”, such as “whilst,” “saddle” for “seat”,“football” for “soccer”, etc., which simply reminds the reviewer that this is an international group of authors, and perhaps reminds the reader of this reviewers attempt at being thorough. The book does give broad coverage in 16 chapters and several sub chapters. Several chapters provide very unique perspective, such that it is with regret I make mention of only a few (see previous recommendation re TOC). For example, a chapter authored by a Urologist brings clinical gems that are clearly beyond textbook knowledge, and which can only be accomplished with many years of dedicated observation and experience. A remarkable chapter by an Irish physiotherapist is worth the price of the book alone, titled; Practical anatomy, examination, palpation and manual therapy release techniques for the pelvic floor. An exceptional chapter on external soft tissue manipulation approaches is very thorough in presentation, very well researched with over 100 references and an abundance of images. It is followed by another exceptional one on connective tissue and the pudendal nerve, with an abundance of hands-on eval and treatment strategies. The chapter on urological CPP has broad overview in 7 pages and does not disappoint the manual soft tissue clinician with 12 pages on neuromuscular treatment, especially of internal trigger points. The reviewer feels compelled to remind the reader of the exceptional DVD covering much of the clinical content. Both genders are covered throughout the book, and in fact, there is a specific chapter titled “Gender and CPP”. A noteworthy chapter on sports and CPP which happens to be the longest chapter in the book, covers broad territory, including detailed coverage of pressure studies on bicycle saddles (seats) as it relates to pudendal neuralgia and several other important topics such as osteitis pubis, sports hernia, hip pathology and peri-inguinal neuropathies, etc.. Many of the sub topics could be a chapter unto itself, yet the introductory resource here is still very valuable. In other chapters, topic such as a recent improvement in a wand for self-treatment of pelvic floor trigger points, and neuromodulation of sacral nerves with electrodes applied distally (lower leg) truly meet the definition of “cutting edge” as much as that term can be over utilized and pedestrian. The pudendal neuralgia chapter is remarkably lucid. Very slight redundancy in some soft tissue treatment and graphics is non-detracting, especially as different authors bring unique perspective, and there are enough novel graphics of this complex region. Limited coverage of the role of physical therapy in utilizing manipulation and mobilization of the spine and pelvic girdle is disappointing, seeming to favor the Osteopathic approach. Otherwise, there is an excellent chapter specifically on Osteopathic approaches, except for an attempt within it to over generalize the physical therapy approach to lumbopelvic dysfunction, citing only one rehab model. A 5-star bonus is the appendix with functional outcome scales with very helpful introductory paragraphs and instructions for scoring. There are 11 listed clinical outcome measurement tools, including the very comprehensive IPPS pelvic pain assessment form. The final inclusion is a description of eight standard pelvic pain provocation tests from the European guidelines. One disappointment is what I call “a missing chapter element”. Partially covered in a general manner within the multi-specialty and multidisciplinary (UK) chapter and the interdisciplinary (US) chapter; is the team approach to this complex topic, and the listing of multiple specialties. However, the missing element is a much needed guide which would go beyond the assumption that the client is already under the care of an appropriate medical physician(s) as part of the team for CPP. The title of a proposed chapter would be something similar to: “The necessity ofscreening for medical referral, what every manual, alternative/complimentary, body/mind and movement practitioner should know.” Additional coverage on the topic of pelvic joint instability, obstetric pubic symphyseal diastasis and orthopedic trauma instabilities seem worthy of inclusion, perhaps as its own chapter. Unfortunately, some of this is actually trivialized as being a belief system that predicts failure of intervention (see Figure 1.1). Although this perception is valid at times, many other times, as evidenced with traditional imaging, it is a valid contemporary source of debilitating CPP, as evidenced by web sites such as the www.PelvicInstability.org.au, (one of several) orthopedic trauma research, obstetric literature, etc.. The book is a carefully crafted work that belongs in the hands of all hands-on clinicians who specialize in the subject matter or who want to specialize, and for others who simply desire to be more aware of it. Also as a relevant resource to practitioners who utilize the team approach. The book has solid, vast, theoretical underpinning within the first eight chapters, and the following eight chapters are specific to intervention with an abundance of hands-on techniques such that“Physical Medicine” practitioners can learn and integrate in their practice, or, at the very least, fine-tune current skills. This text is placed prominently on the reviewer’s accessible bookshelf in the clinic, and it is endorsed with a 4.5/5 star recommendation. Jerry Hesch, MHS, PT |
Dr. Jerry Hesch, DPT, MHS, PTMarried with 4 grown kids. Earned my Doctorate at A.T. Still University in Tempe, AZ, MHS at the University of Indianapolis and my BS PT at University of New Mexico. I enjoy working with my hands and particularly making glass objet d'art. Powered by Calendar Labs Archives
August 2016
Categories
All
|
RSS Feed